Colombia
-
Ecologist from Bogotá, Colombia. Currently studying a master on geography in Universidad de los Andes from Bogotá. In last three years, I have been working on environmental education.
Posted on Jul 23 2009 at 04:04AM by gquimbayo
I think that current biodiversity of any territory, space or place, is a result of a relation between human being culture and non-human ecologic dynamics. However we shouldn't see only an ambigous and simple society/nature relation on this matter. For example, the Ecosystem Approach principles can help us to understand that all biodiversity levels are important to design and may be dream, new socio-ecological places of life. In other words, not only preserve and conserve biodiversity are important. But also create, design and dream a true life unity in any place is clue to engage biodiversity on Earth.
Greetings from Colombia.
Posted on Jul 28 2009 at 03:09AM by gquimbayo
Dear Jennyjst,
Of course, I agree with all of your approaches. All of the ecology and environmental process in any place on Earth, are the product of the complex, non-human life and human dynamics in historic scales of space-time. However the cosmogony of each culture or "civilization" on the world, tends to use what we regard as "nature", "biodiversity" and so on. Use isn't bad, but we must engage more humanistic and not anthropocentric conservation values on our relation with nature and biodiversity.
Best regards!
Read more on this topic »
Posted on Jul 28 2009 at 03:12AM by gquimbayo
I just leave a question:
¿How reduce biodiversity loss without neglecting issues such as poverty and social inequity?
Greetings!
Read more on this topic »Posted on Jul 29 2009 at 03:54AM by gquimbayo
Thanks for reply and share us your approach. I think that the current global economic "breakdown", suggests us another way of life. In other words a better way to reduce biodiversity loss.
Best regards!
Read more on this topic »Posted on Jul 29 2009 at 04:23AM by gquimbayo
I like to share you the next link:
Edward O. Wilson Saving life on Earth.
Greetings!
Read more on this topic »Posted on Jul 30 2009 at 03:35AM by gquimbayo
Totally agree. Excellent words Jennyjst.
All things are "connect". ¿When the world understand that development
and conservation can go hand in hand? We can't continue thinking that
biodiversity is a luxury, is another chance to human and life
development. However, remember, development isn't equal to economic
growth.
On the other hand, Jennyjst, you must click on reply button and shows a similar message cage.
Well,
about breeding, is very important to debate this topic. But, ¿another
conservation mesures have not been controversial? For example, the
fight against alien species or the declaration of a protected area, is
not controversial in some cases?
I think that we must engage intelligent debates about this,
Best regards for everyone!
Posted on Jul 31 2009 at 06:41PM by gquimbayo
Dear Plato,
The first one. The world must understand that the relation development-conservation is possible, is different to an economic model that gives priority only to capital accumulation.
Greetings.
Read more on this topic »Posted on Aug 02 2009 at 04:05AM by gquimbayo
Thanks for your comments, reading and sharing the video. It's about "shared responsability" between people and the governments. About video, is a classical example of the social and ecological effects of what we call here in South America: "bonanzas" of resources, for example, like rubber, gold, and in the extreme cases like coca crops for making cocaine.
About this I share these links:
Canadian mining in Colombia
Crops for a illicite use and ecocide
I stress that one way to avoid the biodiversity loss, it must exist environmental justice measures for the people.
Greetings!
Read more on this topic »Posted on Aug 02 2009 at 11:58PM by gquimbayo
Hey everyone!
Since we have been discussing about biodiversity and human development, ¿what do you think about including the concept of biodiversity into development policies? ¿It has been effective?
Greetings!
Read more on this topic »Posted on Aug 06 2009 at 04:20AM by gquimbayo
About these and in a different view, the next links to further reading:
Negotiations of the International Regime on ABS
Forest in a changing climate
Greetings!
Posted on Aug 07 2009 at 05:52PM by gquimbayo
Thanks to Jennyjst and Sarah for your comments. In my opinion the policies are important, but aren't the only one solution. All the society must encourage for: 1)know the environmental values (incluiding what we know biodiversity) of our territory
Greetings.
Posted on Aug 10 2009 at 12:11PM by gquimbayo
Hi, Trajanopaiva.
I think the same, but the "mistreatment" or ignorance have the most part on the entrepeneur and industries sectors and some of politicians around the world that some have even made "conservation" laws. I'm not saying that these sectors have not taken any initiative, but many social and community groups have proposed solutions to conservation management that have not been heard enough and are unknown. The education must be concentrate on generates knowledge, not only repeating it.
Greetings!
Posted on Aug 11 2009 at 04:38AM by gquimbayo
Hi everyone!
I want to show you an endagered species from Colombia, the Cotton-headed tamarin (Saguinus oedipus). This species can be illustrate the current condition of colombian ecosystems, product of a dynamic relation between human societies and non-human nature, but that in some cases with a nefaste impact: habitat-loss and environmental conflicts.
Saguinus oedipus: In Arkive:
http://www.arkive.org/cotton-headed-tamarin/saguinus-oedipus/
Thanks for reading!
Posted on Aug 27 2009 at 03:59AM by gquimbayo
Hi Everyone!
I shall you to share this approach from Karl Zimmerer, an important geographer in his essay: "Cultural ecology: at the interface with political ecology – the new geographies of
environmental conservation and globalization" about the importance about conservation, protected areas and human development:
"New research in cultural and political ecology
is helping to elucidate in conceptual and
empirical terms the relative importance
and functioning of both conservation territories
and the social-environmental networks
of environmental globalization. Indeed, environmental
globalization has increased the prominence of both contiguous-style conservation
territories as well as networks. These
findings suggest that the global expansion of
conservation areas may bear resemblances
to the spatialities of globalization that thus
far have occupied attention primarily in the
terms of political, economic, and cultural
processes..." (Zimmerer, 2006:71).
What do you think?
Greetings
Read more on this topic »Posted on Aug 27 2009 at 04:08AM by gquimbayo
I think that education should be a knowledge-building tool, not a doctrine about how to "manage" biodiversity. It's a cultural topic where behaviorism has been a little dangerous.
Bye!
Read more on this topic »Posted on Sep 07 2009 at 01:01PM by gquimbayo
Hi Everyone!
Thanks to Connect2Earth for keeping this space for discussion and ideas.
I read about geoengineering in past posts. This is an approach (another point of view) from Martin Rees and that share to the world the ETC Group:
Here the link:
http://www.etcgroup.org/en/issues/geoengineering.html
¿What do you think?
Best regards!
Posted on Sep 25 2009 at 11:14AM by gquimbayo
Hi Everyone!
I just have a few questions for the discussion,
¿The climate change is only a entrepreneurship matter? ¿What about common people? ¿It is a only tecnhnology matter?
For these questions I share some links:
http://www.cleanskies.com/events/council-competitiveness
http://www.foei.org/en/what-we-do/un-climate-talks/global/2009/demand-climate-justice-in-copenhagen
Best regards!
Read more on this topic »